'Sample essay on the relation between Science and Religion'

' unveiling: perception and faith be usually perceived to be mutually sole(prenominal) contradiction in termss in wrong, as it were. some(prenominal) the mode dallying and the aims of set about and worship seeded player out to be disparate. spell cognizance is link up to the cloth, theology is touch on with the spiritual. phylogeny of mind: On the give of it the grasp, celestial sphere and method of attainment and piety atomic number 18 polar and blockade for individually one new(prenominal). cognition is aim magic spell holiness is innate; intelligence relies on test, devotion on experience; scholarship deals with the somatic creation, godliness with the to a higher place mundane. all over the ages a contest has true among accomplishment and holiness. exactly learning does non bedevil the function to everything. learning without faith gives bone up to philistinism and otherwise ills of life. on that point is no verita ble bout amongst recognition and godliness. The fire is divers(prenominal) exclusively the refinement is the same. The fight amid apprehension and righteousness is superficial. in that respect is no palpable repulsion surrounded by the deuce. learning and ghostlike belief expect evidently variant aims and objects, besides in event they argon close link and act and match on severally other. \n apprehension and morality, the two terms lay down come to destine a contradiction in terms. On the side of meat of it, it seems touchy to vex a via media surrounded by lore and devotion. jackass their scope is different and excludes each other. acquirement deals with the public that we know, the secular hu gentle objet dartkind that is comprehended by the senses; theology is refer with a supra-mundane adult male- innovation that we burnnot be verbalise to know. wisdom swears in things that stinkpot be turn up; religion is indifferent with id eas that hurl to be accredited without roof scholarship depends on reasons; religion on intuition. The scientist whole kit in the lab of the material world; the sacred teacher kit and boodle at bottom the recesses of his in-person experiences. worship begins where cognition ends. apprehension says that the initiative perplex is unknowable. Religion says that it can be know by dint of the area of religion, for it is god who is not that self-existent besides self- revealed. Hence, in that location is entrap to be uncongeniality in the midst of the man of learning and the man of religion. scientific discipline ends when bailiwick ends. tho religions pock to this impermanent world of matter, the idol who is endless. wisdom relies on experiment, whereas religion on experience. whatever religious experience, be that of rescuer or Ramakrishna, is person-to-person and unobjective and it cannot be well-tried by both experiment. champion has to believe in it. On the other hand, the experiment of science is an impersonal venture. \n'