Trend in Heritage Tourism

Are the trends in inheritance laperry having an put together on creative activity hereditary pattern sites? mouse Using in depth secondary research this account aims to try on the impacts of hereditary pattern touristry to miscellaneous heritage sites in hurt of authority threats and opportunities associated with touristry development and growth. In addition there allow for be an analysing of the research methodologies employ in order to identify abstractive theoretical account surrounding ara of occupy to clarify the outcomes of results.With sound forethought and be after heritage tourism open fire contribute to the local anesthetic scrimping as sound as the preservation and restoration of the historical monuments at the identical prison term connecting the local culture, which represents a signifi shadowt period of homo history, with globular cultures. Although benefits of this casing of tourism do exist there be assorted issues app arnt at n umerous historical sites. This study focuses on the impression of acceptability in terms of envisioning the implications of tourism to make heritage and its surroundings. nd the local culture, as well as to the development of the communities if planning and instruction is that dwell therein in terms of planning and perplexity in order to restore, preserve historical monuments at the same time guess Abstract Using in depth secondary research this paper aims to examine the impacts of heritage tourism to various heritage sites in terms of potential threats and opportunities associated with tourism development and growth. In addition there will be an analysing of the research methodologies used in order to identify theoretical framework surrounding reach of study to clarify the outcomes of results.With effective management and planning heritage tourism give the axe contribute to the local economy as well as the preservation and restoration of the historical monuments at the sa me time connecting the local culture, which represents a significant period of human history, with global cultures. Although benefits of this type of tourism do exist there are various issues apparent at numerous historical sites. This study focuses on the fancy of sustainability in terms of consciousness the implications of tourism to built heritage and its surroundings. nd the local culture, as well as to the development of the communities if planning and management is that dwell therein in terms of planning and management in order to restore, preserve historical monuments at the same time understand Introduction A catalyst for poverty alleviation, tourism is considered to be one of the worlds largest industries, as it acts as a make out driver for development through foreign exchange earnings and the organisation of direct and indirect employment WTO (2012, a). touristry contributes 5% of the worlds gross domestic product and accounts for 6% of the worlds trades in servi ces, making it the fourth largest export sector after fuels, chemicals and automotive products. Tourism is account adequate for 235 million jobs or one in every 12 jobs globally (WTO 2012, a). With a bring down of 705 million tourists up to August 2012, global tourism is to rise to 1billion by the end of 2012(WTO, 2012, b). In 2007, heathen tourism accounted for 40% of all worldwide tourism (Mintel, 2010).These results produced are highly adequate as they directly came from WTO whom monitors the trends of tourism and provide an up to date statistic analysis in a seasonable mode in order understand the affects and impacts of tourism on a global level. The results from Mintel can be considered reliable as entropy was actd by organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) tourism committee whom activity aims at promoting the culture of evaluation in tourism.As the growth in tourism can help sustain cultural heritage sites, but has severe consequences, since enormou s growth can affect the configuration of cultural sites and monuments as they are becoming heavily congested by tourist. Discussions and analysis of key theories and recitation of research methods hereditary pattern mainly represents the past and the future, its meaning is associated with the word in heritance which basically explains when something is passed from one generation to the next generation. heritage acts as a carrier of historical values from the past, which can be viewed as bulge of the cultural tradition.Therefore the linkage between heritage and tourism exist by reconstructing the past in the present through interpretation i. e. cultural brokers (Nuryanti,1996). Heritage tourism is a dust of special interest tourism (Nuryanti,1996). Heritage can be a form of living or built elements of culture which has nonphysical or tangible features such as buildings, locations, cuisines and humanistic discipline and crafts (Timothy and Nyaupane, 2009). The academic adapted these view by exploring various tourism connect journals. This may be reliable as they are peer viewed by other academics and experts round the athletic field of study.This type of research method can help when trying to understand a particularized study area before it can progress to any other research methods. still journals may not be able to resolving power a specific question that needs to be investigated as it has been created virtually the academics particular area of study, answering questions that the academics are particularly researching or investigating around. According to Zepal and hall (1991) heritage tourism motivations are ground on nostalgia for the past and the lust to experience diverse cultural landscapes and forms.This quote may not be factual but rather the authors perspectives as the postmodern tourist may have influence by other motives. The motives to anticipate cultural historical sites were influenced by having a curiosity in history, visit cu ltural attractions/events and visiting a historical attractions/events (Kolar and zabkar,2010 cited in Swarbrooke,1999). ethnical motivations can give an report of what precedes authentic experiences (Kolar and zabkar,2010). This reading was obtained by the means of conducting a survey on 25 Romanesque heritage sites in four European countries.The results identified that cultural motivation is significant subsequent of both object-based and empirical authenticity, which in turn influences tourist perceptions. Although surveys can be gathered quickly and administered easily, response rates can be bias as the results of a survey are randomly s international ampereled, normally used to target a selective of participants. Furthermore the results were only generalizing on specific heritage settings. This makes it laborious to identify if tourists have similar experiences and perceptions in other heritage settings.An idea of the motivations and behaviours of heritage tourists are, es sential if the impacts on heritage sites are to be managed sustainably (Kolar and zabkar, 2010). Heritage tourism can create employment, alleviate poverty, curb rural escape migration, and increase alliance empowerment. The dynamic characteristics of tourism can contribute to preserving and enhancing intangible and tangible cultural heritage. However Intangible and tangible cultural assets whether it is built or a living must be analyzed and managed well in order to flourish in an increasingly globalized world.However this relies on endorse holders occasion such as the partnerships between communities and the tourism and heritage industries. This is because the genuine appreciation for the aspirations and values of all parties can influence the survival of heritage tourism (UNWTO, 2012). This discipline can be considered as accurate as UNWTO monitor cultural tourism activities and are able to understand the implications of tourism through observations of tourist flows and touri sm developments in various heritage sites, in addition working with various stake holders and tourism departments.UNESCO adopted the convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage sites in 1972(Garrod and Fyall, 2009). Since then there has been 936 designated world heritage sites located in 159 states party. The aim of the convention is to ensure the identification, protection, conservation, presentation and infection to future generations of cultural and natural heritage of outstanding universal value (Garrod and Fyall, 2009 cited in UNESCO, 20082).The information produce can be considered accurate as it was obtained from UNESCO published documents which is based on factual information rather than ones opinion. However it has been debated that the world Heritage listings has had an influenced in the increase in visitant numbers to world heritage sites. Considerable growth in tourist interest has been distinguished as a driving aspect in latest wor ld heritage selections (Landorf 2009 cited in Jones & Munday, 2001). This information was conducted by observations of tourist movements to six heritage sites in the UK.However as this type of research gathered is a form of observation it may be considered as a genuine advent as visitants do not notice that they are being memorise so they would act to their normal nature. This approach allows you to understanding certain tourists behaviour patterns which can be based on Mathieson and groyne (1982) consumer buying behaviour precedent. The research associated with the Mathieson and ring (1982) consumer buying behaviour set can be considered out dated as it does not facial expression into the current perspectives of geographical approaches to understanding consumer behaviour.A more current consumer behaviour sit will need to be adapted in order to understand todays tourists as they may differ from the past tourists. Tourism might place stress on world heritage sites which gr owth, is escalate by which contradicts the standards at the core of the universe Heritage Convention, which emphasis that world heritage sites should maintain a function in current partnership life at the same time being preserved for transmission to future generations (UNESCO, 1972, b).In this case it is a vital issue that tourism activities should be sustainable in order to allow sites that gain world heritage status to maintain their status (Garrod & Fyall, 2000). The information was conducted using desk surpass research. This information may be bias as it is based on experts personal opinions. Tourism may not be the best solution for the development of heritage sites unless planning is involved. Heritage tourism can influence participation developments. For framework Wadi Al-Hitan in Egypt, witnessed small surmount developments by local communities supplying most of the services available to the visitors experiences.Management of the heritage site worked closely with lo cals of the site to develop their condenser in regards to the site but also with regards to developing their skills for providing these services to the tourists i. e. tour guides. A affirmatory outcome has been associated with this is frugal development of local communities imputable to well-planned tourism at Wadi Al Hitan. The Canaima National Park in Venezuela and Shiretoko in Japan are other examples of sites that also demonstrate good methods for community involvement and collaboration and hence development of heritage sites (Borges et al, 2011).This information was gathered by taking notes from the interviews from experts in this area of study. Interviews are very effective if conducted using appropriate questions in order to get an instant answer to your questions raised. This method of research is beneficial as it can validate information that already exists. The results for this interview did indicate that there are some positive outcomes for heritage tourism if managed well, however stakeholders will have to involve to community for it to be boffo.Although tourism is normally honoured for being able to reconcile conservation and development destructions in or near protected areas, there are existing negative impacts that are affecting world heritage sites status. For example Machu Picchu in Peru faces pressure from 900,000 annual tourists who visit the ancient Inca city. The tourists place a threat on the ecological integrity, physical body and cultural authenticity of the world heritage site and surrounding areas, including the Inca Trail (Larson and Poudyal, 2012).Information was influenced by Andean tour operators. As they are recognised tour operator this type of research approach is good, as they will have connections with other tourism related institutions in order to understand what is going on in particular countries in terms of tourist flows and impacts to particular destinations which they may be operating in. UNESCO has previously war ned about uncontrolled access at Machu Picchu in Peru and advised the authorities to make conservation a priority (BBC newsworthiness, 2012).This information was gather from the BBC news is reliable as news is a blood line which is most current and up to date with worldwide issues. Due to ample tourism developments at heritage sites planning strategies are essential in order to control tourism (Hall, 2008). For a plan to be successful it needs to implement an effective planning approach which is vision and goal oriented, integrative, market driven, resource driven, consultative and systematic (Hall,2008). However Simpson (2001) identified that specific examples of community involvement in the planning process hardly exist.Environmental and economic objectives are more notional than social objectives, creating problematic process as the three dimensions as they are not being equally tempered (Agyeman & Evans, 2003). Figure one illustrates the process in which sustainable touris m should be managed at heritage sites. Through sustainability soft and hard visitor management techniques have been implemented at various heritage sites in order to control and monitor visitor flows cooper et al, 2005. This information was obtained by observing the visitor management techniques implemented at the Great Wall of China.In this case this is a good method as the results give an understanding of what management techniques effective for heritage sites. Source (Larson and Poudyal, 2012) Source (Larson and Poudyal, 2012) Conclusion It is homely that academics in this area of study heavily rely on soft research in order to discover their answer. This may be that callable to the nature of heritage tourism, the best way to understand the area is by identifying what motivates tourist to this type of tourism and what are the implications, opportunities and solutions in order to sustain heritage tourism.These types of questions may need to be answered by tourists that particip ate in this type of tourism and stake holders involved. In this way it can be said that the reason why surveys, interviews and observation methods might be used is to investigate specifically in detail answers that may not be found conducting desk top research, due to the limitations of areas that are specifically studied around a particular academics research. However institutions such as the WTO, OECD use valued and qualitative, methods in order measure and monitor progress and direct actions related to tourism related impacts, threats and opportunities.It can be recommended that academics use both qualitative and quantitative research in order to develop well circumstantial and effective results around the area of study. Overall it is clear from the study that in order for heritage tourism to be preserved sustainability is the key concept surrounding the phenomenon. Tourists, Stake holders, communities and tourism institutions are equally involve in achieving sustainability in world heritage sites as they each have an effect on the outcomes of its survival in terms of future developments. References Agyeman, J. & Evans, T. (2003). Toward sustainability in urban communities Building equal rights with sustainable solutions. Annals of the American honorary society of Political and Social Sciences. 590. pp 3553. BBC news, (2012) Machu Picchu Peru unveils plans for new airport. Available at http//www. bbc. co. uk/news/world-latin-america-19353660 Accessed second December, 2012 Borges,A. M. ,Carbone,G. ,Bushell,R. and Jaeger,T. (2011) Sustainable tourism and natural World Heritage. Switzerland IUCN Gland, Switzerland Cooper,C. ,Fletcher,J. ,Fyal,A. , Gilbert,D. & Wanhill,S. 2005)Tourism principles and practice. Essex Pearson cultivation limited Garrod, B. , & Fyall, A. (2000). Managing heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 27(3). pp 682708. Garrod,B. and Fyall,A. Contemporary cases in Tourism. Volume 1. Oxford Goodfellow Publishers Limited. In UNESCO (2008) World Heritage. Availble athttp//whc. unesco. org/en/list/514 Garrod, B. , & Fyall, A. (2000). Managing heritage tourism. Annals of Tourism Research. 27(3). pp 682708. *Hall, C. M. (2008). Tourism planning. Policies, processes and relationships, Harlow, Pearson Education LimitedKolar,T. and zabkar,V. (2010) A consumer-based model of authenticity An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing. 31 (5) October. pp. 65266. In Swarbrooke, J. (1999) The development and management of visitor attractions. Oxford Butterworth-Heinemann, Kolar,T. and zabkar,V. (2010) A consumer-based model of authenticity An oxymoron or the foundation of cultural heritage marketing. 31 (5). October. pp 652664 Larson,R. L. and Poudyal,C. N. (2012) Developing sustainable tourism through adaptive resource management a case study of Machu Picchu, Peru. 0(7). pp 917-938 Landorf ,C. ( 2009) Managing for sustainable tourism a review of six cultural World Heritage localises. 17(1). pp5 3-70. In Jones, C. , & Munday, M. (2001). Blaenavon and United Nations World Heritage Site status Is conservation of industrial heritage a road to local economic development? regional Studies. 35(6). pp 585590. Mathieson, A. and Wall, G. (1982) Tourism Economic, Physical and Social Impacts. Harlow Longman. Mintel (2010) heathen and Heritage Tourism International. Available athttp//academic. mintel. om/display/482710/? highlight=trueAccessedsecond December, 2012 Nuryanti,W. (1996) HERITAGE AND POSTMODERN TOURISM. Annalr of Tourirm Research. 23 (2) pp. 249-260, Simpson, K. (2001). Strategic planning and community involvement as contributors to sustainable tourism development. Current Issues in Tourism, 4(1). pp 341. Timothy, J. D. and Nyaupane, P. G. 2009 Cultural Heritage and Tourism in the Developing World A Regional Perspective. Oxon Routledge UNWTO (2012) Tourism and Intangible Cultural Heritage. Available at http//ethics. unwto. rg/en/ fill/tourism-and-intangible-cultural-he ritageAccessed 3rd December,2012 UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. capital of France UNESCO. WTO (2012 a) Tourism and Poverty Alleviation. Available at http//step. unwto. org/en/content/tourism-and-poverty-alleviation-1Accessed 2nd December, 2012 WTO (2012 b) International tourism strong despite uncertain economy. Available at. http//www2. unwto. org/en/press-release/2012-11-05/international-tourism-strong-despite-uncertain-economyAccessed 2nd December, 2012 Zeppal, H. and